October Enews
 

Please make a note of the next ACTA meeting which will be a PHYSICAL meeting
1.00pm on Thursday 8 December 2022
at the North Bar upstairs room
2D Oxford Buildings 
Cheltenham Parade 
Harrogate HG1 1DA

directions 

 

This will be an opportunity to meet socially and discuss our group and its future. All are welcome. Please bring a friend.

If people want to get lunch at the North Bar please arrive early enough to bring your lunch upstairs and be ready to start the meeting at 1.00pm Our next meeting will be a zoom meeting at 2pm on Thursday 2 February 2023 but more about that in the next enews.

Please reply to this email to contact us about anything in this enews

 

Towards  Synodality - Parishes walking together…but how?

At our October ACTA Leeds zoom meeting we shared recent developments in our own parishes. (See round-up of these below by David Jackson.) 

There were numerous instances of new ways of working, with lay people becoming more involved (with or without the support of the Parish Priest). These were noted as examples of what parishes are actually doing across the diocese at this time. Although we felt that supporting projects and actions to establish opportunities for communion, participation and mission in our own parishes was crucial, we also asked how good practice can being shared and discussed within the Diocese. 

One of the ‘Difficulties, Obstacles and Wounds’ identified in the Diocese of Leeds Synodal Report; a synthesis of feedback from across the diocese, (on the first phase of the Parish to Mission listening exercise), was the reluctance of some clergy to engage fully, for various reasons. This, in effect, denied their parishioners the opportunity to participate openly. How can this post-code lottery of opportunity be made fairer, given the difficulty that ‘the Church needs to communicate much more effectively at every level’ and that ‘communication is a two-way process, and this does not characterise the Church’s internal communications at present. Strategies need to be developed to enable this change to take placeSynodal Synthesis Report p.8 

There is also a need for parishes to be able to communicate with each other as part of this two-way process. Deanery meetings are currently only for clergy. Is there an opportunity for better communication involving laity here? At diocesan level we have the Leeds Diocesan Pastoral Council which Bishop Marcus established in 2019. From The Diocesan website : 

The Decree on the Apostolate of the Laity issued by the Second Vatican Council states that: “The laity has an active part of their own in the life and action of the Church. Their action within the Church communities is so necessary that without it the apostolate of the pastors will frequently be unable to obtain its full effect.” For this reason the Statutes for the Leeds Diocesan Pastoral Council have been drawn-up to try to involve all of the major Catholic lay organisations which exercise an apostolate within our Diocese, yet remain with a size of membership that will enable it to be focussed in its work. The knowledge, experience and the current concrete pastoral apostolate of these organisations will enable the Diocesan Pastoral Council to be more strategic and effective as a consultative body.  

There is no mention of parish representation. At the time of its constitution, the Pastoral Council represented a step in the right direction, but given the feedback and conclusions of our diocesan Parish to Mission listening exercise we might ask if it is now fit for purpose. How does its current representation help our parish communities to walk together in the journey of communion, participation and mission? 

The Synodal Report states in its conclusion:  "A synthesis of the responses from the diocesan listening sessions and online contributions will be prepared by a synthesis team comprising members of the lay faithful and clergy. This will then be presented to the bishop. In a parallel process, members of the steering group will work with the various departments of the diocesan curia to bring together statistical information packs for each parish, vicariate and the entire diocese. This will enable the people of the diocese to see clearly what resources are at their disposal. It is envisaged that there will need to be a third phase of listening where the diocesan family begins to discern how it best places those resources at the service of the pastoral priorities identified in the preceding phases." P9-10.  

All this will take time and energy. However there is no reason why our thoughts and reflections shouldn’t contribute to current discussion and action; after all, the principal resource at our disposal is the People of God in the diocese. Indeed, in view of the urgency for effective communication, this may be an optimal time for Bishop Marcus and the Diocesan Synodal  Steering Group to develop the channels of communication which already exist. These would  provide established and more representative ways by which the diocesan family (including lay people and parishes) will be able to "discern how it best places its resources at the service of the pastoral priorities identified"Parish or deanery representation on a diocesan synodal council would facilitate wider participation across the diocese and opportunities for the sharing of parish practice, for listening and discernment and would  "encourage and facilitate dialogue and listening in an open and meaningful way" (P.8).Hopefully we won’t have to wait for the results of the continental phase and the World Synod in late 2023 before we decide to get on with the job. The Diocesan Synodal Report is a call to action in a new, post-covid environment

The report found many joys expressed in personal faith. One was the joy of companionship on the faith journey. That certainly applied to those of us at the ACTA meeting. One of the positive outcomes of the Parish to Mission exercise in our diocese was the training of eighty or so lay-facilitators for the parish listening meetings. But will this pool of talent, that newly found resource to support the processes of listening and discerning, be sustained….or will it evaporate?  Perhaps such training on a sustained basis within the diocese would address some of the concerns identified in the report, extract below: 

"There is an appeal for the Church to become a Listening Church as well as being a Teaching Church. Such expectations in the responses call for a cultural change, moving to one that is listening, trustful, invitational and inclusive; it also requires the development of structures in the Church at every level which encourage and facilitate dialogue and listening in an open and transparent way.

Other respondents call for leadership qualities in the Church that are: contemporary, pragmatic and open to change; willing to learn from the serious mistakes of the past; operate within a flatter model of leadership that promotes shared leadership and the empowerment of the laity; and, a large number are calling for discussion and listening forums

Some of the responses indicate that people feel excluded from participating in the decision making in the Church and wish to have more involvement in the process, whether it be greater consultation or empowerment. To exercise their responsibility to ask questions, structures need to be established, such as parish pastoral councils, to widen participation in the parish and diocesan communities. 

What the majority of the responses evidence is a real desire by people to participate more fully in the life of the Church, with its leaders promoting among laypeople an understanding of their baptismal dignity in Christ and their apostolic vocation. There is real appreciation that the insights and charisms of the laity are a gift to the Church and need to be harnessed. Respondents believe there are many people with untapped talents and skills waiting for the invitation to be active in the mission of the Church, and that all the faithful should be helped and encouraged to discern and nurture their particular gifts. 

To participate effectively and to mobilise the laity’s knowledge and skills will require much more formation than is provided for them by the Church at present, and this is something that respondents recognise very clearly. They use different words – catechesis, education, formation, and training – but what they are expressing is an appetite, indeed a hunger for improved knowledge and skills, not least to have the knowledge that inspires greater confidence to profess their Catholic Faith. That confidence is not evident at present."(Synodal Synthesis Report P.8  our italics)

We offer these reflections, together with the examples of individual parish actions, to all those involved in listening and dialogue as our contribution to the synodal process in Leeds. We offer these in the spirit of thanks, prayer and support for the teams responsible for developing synodality across the diocese at this critical time

 

Vince Borg

LEEDS ACTA MEETING - ROUND-UP OF PARISH SYNODAL TAKE-UP

At our Zoom meeting on 6 October 2022, attendees reported on their parish take-up of the Synodal Process after Phases 1 and 2. Reports of Phase 2 meetings had not yet been received by  parishes. Reports covered 9 parishes - 3 outside the diocese. SP = Synodal Process.

PARISHES

1. This parish developed a Parish Forum since lockdown - open to all, to share ideas. Two new priests are shared with another parish. Both parishes have separate new PPCs; the Forum continues to meet to feed in ideas to these. The parish is keen, to continue work once the Phase 2 feedback has been received.

2. Parish groups had been organised by a religious sister to discuss Fratelli Tutti with great effect – new life is emerging; old ideas challenged. An unacknowledged part of the SP – but one involving its values: (Not a Leeds parish)

3. The clergy ‘feared’ the SP, whereas lay people offer the promise of support. No Phase 2 meeting was  
held – the PP ‘not keen’.

4. Two priests replaced by two new ones – significantly their feelings about the SP are not known.

5. PP never mentions the SP, unless prompted. Disillusionment setting in. All the laity can do is pray and progress lay-led initiatives independently of talk of the synod. Progress is being made ‘from the shop-floor’.

6. Good take up – by both a thoroughly ‘synodal priest’ and people: lively parish life, an open PPC set up organised by a small SP steering group. Parish aiming to become a LiveSimply one – which may have happened with or without the SP. Lots of positive collaborative energy.

7. In a large parish a team is taking the SP forward to an agreed plan, fully supported by the PP. (Not a Leeds parish)

8. In a two church parish, one has continued its ‘cosy’ social life and ecumenical links. This is unrelated to the SP but embodies its values. The other larger church building is not conducive to engendering community, and is made up of disparate groups. The majority of mass-goers are not involved in parish life. The PP regarded the SP as a passing phase; gave passive support to the two phase meetings, attended by small groups. The SP has made little impact on the great majority of people.

9. In another diocesan Cathedral parish the Synod ‘had not happened’, engagement is not encouraged in the hope ‘it will go away’.

Several ACTA members acted as facilitators for Phase 2. They reported that two parishes were already ‘synodal’ but that overall numbers involved had declined from Phase 1. Some PPs and therefore parishes had not taken up the offer of a Phase 2 meeting. In some, lay people are keen, despite the PP not being and so just try and carry on the SP as best they can.

CONCLUSION.
This very small snap-shot of just 6 Leeds diocese parishes shows that since parishes are just setting out on the SP, the PP’s attitude is crucial. This has been generally lukewarm or even negative in 4 parishes, and positive in just 2. Whilst the SP may not be the ‘name on the shingle’ of lay-led initiatives, they are taking the initiative with or without clerical support.

Their efforts incorporate synodal values: collaboration, dialogue, mutual listening, honest reflection etc – to follow the inspiration of the Holy Spirit towards their shared dream of a synodal church.

There is a clear need for further formation for both laypeople and clergy as to what synodality means in terms of parish worship, life and mission - and as to where parishes go next.

David Jackson 7 October 2022

Not much time left to book for this
Has the Church become a ‘Not for Prophets’ Organisation?

A Day of Reflection for anyone in the Diocese of Leeds who wants to take a day out to reflect on the current state of the world.

Our Lady Immaculate & St Robert Church 
3 Robert Street Harrogate HG1 1HP
Sat, 15 October 2022, 10:00 – 16:00 BST

Free but you need to register here

9th National ACTA Conference 
The Parish? The Now and Future Church

10.30 - 16.30   Saturday 22nd  October  2022

The theme of this year’s Conference is an examination of the role and function of the parish in a technological, post-Covid world. How will our sense of parish be shaped by our experience of synodality? What changes need to occur for it to be the prophetic voice in our communities? How do we manage ministry in a parish in the future?

Our principal speaker this year will be Dr Phyllis Zagano, Senior Research Associate-in-Residence, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York. She was
appointed by Pope Francis to the Commission studying the role of women in the diaconate. Her academic interests include forms of ministry and ecclesial reform.

Some dioceses are starting to address the issues raised by their synodal process. Issues of development and formation [ of clergy and laity] were raised in the  vast majority of diocesan reports. We will be hearing from teams from the Archdiocese of Liverpool, the Diocese of Salford and the Archdiocese of Cardiff on how they plan to take forward some of these key issues.

ALL Zoom Conference donations will be forwarded to Dr Zagano's chosen charity.    

Free for everyone under 25 and those on benefits.

More details and how to register here   

Sister Teresa Kennedy does not live in our diocese but has been joining us on zoom but she is leaving the country soon and sent this lovely email - the poster she mentions is above
 
I just wanted to say thank you to all of you for allowing me to be part of your very vibrant group for so long.

At times I could only give thanks that there were folk who had the courage and strength to question and move forward
from where so many are in the Faith and church just now and to have the insight and inspiration to want to do this.
I attach the poster I did for the group I am running currently. Their interest and vibrancy in meeting give me a lift also.
Hopefully some of this group will be inspired to move forward and have a group of their own afterwards.
Bill Huebsch's reading guide is a good base to build on.

Again many thanks and I hope to make the lunch in December. It would be lovely to see folk face to face!!

Bless you,

Teresa
MONSIGNOR WILLIAM STEELE 1930 – 2022

It is a mark of both the man and the priest that Mgr William Steele was known to most folk as plain ‘Billy’! He was a most unclerical of priests yet there was never any doubt of his identity as such. He managed to meld the man fully into the priesthood – seamlessly. But that went against the flow of the dominant clerical culture of the age Billy was born into. Yet that tide was, imperceptibly, on the turn, its first inkling coming with the announcement of the Second Vatican Council. It was called just nine months before Billy’s ordination. Billy’s priesthood was lived for over 60 years in tune with the Council’s teachings and promise. He was a natural Vatican 11 advocate – especially in the ways it began the process of opening the church up to new horizons both inwardly and outwardly. That suited Billy perfectly. He was born to break down barriers and build bridges on every level.

The Cathedral funeral Mass leaflet for Billy (9 September 2022) contains an excellent description of the service he gave to the Church. It talks about a priestly ministry which encompassed ‘three over-lapping elements: pastoral, academic and ecumenical.’ He was a parish priest, he taught in diocesan schools - but his talents as a theologian and his temperament as someone who loved people of whatever stripe made him a national and internationally known ecumenist. He was regarded as someone able to convey the ‘graciousness of God’, the constant awareness that Christian Unity was ‘beyond human power to bring about’ and could only come through the gift of God’s graciousness’. 

Just to add something that Billy in his modesty would never admit to. As Episcopal Vicar for Unity from 1993 to 2004, Billy, whose specialism was ecumenical relations, had also to take under his wing the newly developing and important field of interreligious relations – a field new to him. He was a quick learner! So much so that for ten years he served as a member of the Hierarchy’s Committee for Other Religions. That committee worked for those years to produce its final statement on the theology of interreligious dialogue in 2010: ‘Meeting God in Friend and Stranger’. This was issued in the name of the Bishops. Billy was in fact the main architect and indeed prime drafter of the document, which when it was adopted officially at a meeting of the hierarchy was met by their gracious applause. Billy’s self-effacing graciousness was reflected in that well merited approbation Billy was known as a clear but deeply penetrating thinker and preacher. His daily sermons in retirement at Hinsley Hall were models of the preacher’s art. Lastly, it was no surprise that when in 2012, ACTA launched its efforts in the diocese to encourage level playing fields for dialogue between clergy and laity, Billy slipped into full support of its work with the greatest of ease, no adjustment needed. ACTA benefitted from his wisdom as its annual meetings. His talk at the 18 th January 2014 ACTA meeting is still well worth reading: ‘A Prayerful Reflection On Dialogue. A Meditation on Dialogue and Communion.’ (See the ACTA website for a copy)

A synodal priest before any synodal process, the words in that title serve to sum Billy up: prayerful, reflective, a natural dialoguer, meditative and in full communion with all he met and to whom he brought his reflection of the gracious God he served. He rests in peace.

David Jackson. Interreligious Relations Coordinator 2000 – 2011
Please help with ACTA running costs

Even if you can't attend meetings, you can help the work of ACTA Leeds by donating. Just click on the donate button below. Our website is our main cost and we really need to try to keep our website open. It is not a huge amount and if everyone receiving this enews gave £1, we would have enough. Please help if you can
Please donate
If you prefer to make a direct transfer, rather than use Paypal, the details are below

Account name      ACTA Leeds
Sort code             05-01-26
Account number  10722432


Many thanks to those who have donated especially those who have set up monthly donations
Please follow us on Facebook and twitter. Like or comment if you can
 
Contact
Email us 


Please visit our website. The dialogue in action page includes documents mentioned in this enews
Our website
ACTA Leeds prayer -  Seeking is Seeing
 
Seeking God is as good as seeing God.
Who, but a saint,
Would know so clearly
That the journey is the reality,
The steps are sight,
The effort is reward,
The seeing is the searching,
The dream is the reality?
Seeking God is seeing God.                    
Copyright © *|CURRENT_YEAR|* *|LIST:COMPANY|*, All rights reserved.
*|IFNOT:ARCHIVE_PAGE|* *|LIST:DESCRIPTION|*

Our mailing address is:
*|HTML:LIST_ADDRESS_HTML|* *|END:IF|*

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

*|IF:REWARDS|* *|HTML:REWARDS|* *|END:IF|*